Rediscovering literature
Searches and useful papers are repeatedly reconstructed when discovery history is not maintained.
Evidence-grounded biomedical research workspace
Turn biomedical literature into traceable research intelligence.
Discover papers, build structured evidence, ask grounded questions, develop hypotheses, and inspect the evidence landscape while preserving the scientific trail back to the original source.
AI-assisted scientific output remains inspectable and researcher-reviewed.
PubMed DiscoveryScientific ExtractionEvidence ProvenanceGrounded Q&AHypothesis AssistanceEvidence Mapping
The research friction
Research time is being stolen by fragmented evidence.
Researchers repeatedly rediscover literature, organize papers, extract findings, trace claims, compare contexts, revisit searches, and translate evidence into research questions. bioresearch2go connects that work in one evidence-grounded workspace.
Extracting findings manually
Study information, populations, interventions, outcomes, and limitations remain scattered across full text and notes.
Losing the source trail
Claims copied into summaries and spreadsheets become difficult to trace back to the exact document context.
Comparing unlike contexts
Human, animal, cellular, observational, and interventional findings can look contradictory when their contexts are hidden.
Research workflow
From discovery to an inspectable evidence landscape.
Use the stages that fit the project. Optional tools support the workflow without turning biomedical research into a completion percentage.
- 01
Discover
Search PubMed, preserve Saved Search revisions, and optionally monitor them for new results.
- 02
Organize
Triage candidates through the Research Inbox and retain relevant publications in the project Library.
- 03
Process
Acquire supported reusable PMC content or upload an authorized PDF, then run Scientific Extraction.
- 04
Build Evidence
Generate source-linked Evidence Statements and review them as pending, accepted, corrected, or rejected.
- 05
Reason
Use Scientific Search, Ask My Evidence, and Research Questions over the project evidence base.
- 06
Investigate
Develop grounded candidate hypotheses, record Evidence Relationships, and inspect Evidence Maps and context.
From literature to evidence
Scientific information keeps its source trail.
PublicationFull TextScientific ExtractionEvidence StatementProvenance
Implemented capabilities
Six connected capabilities for evidence-focused biomedical research.
The workspace connects external literature discovery to structured project evidence and researcher-controlled investigation.
01 · Literature Discovery & MonitoringAvailable
Keep important PubMed searches alive.
Build visible PubMed queries, preserve Saved Search revisions, optionally monitor them, and route project-new candidates through the Research Inbox and Library.
- Manual PubMed Discovery
- Repeatable Saved Search revisions
- Optional Monitoring and baseline runs
- Research Inbox triage
- Persistent project Library
- Candidates remain distinct from scientific evidence
// PubMed discovery · project workflowAvailable
PubMed candidate from a manual searchLiterature state—not yet scientific evidence
CANDIDATEResult from a monitored Saved Search revisionLiterature state—not yet scientific evidence
NEWPublication selected for project triageLiterature state—not yet scientific evidence
INBOXPublication retained for deeper processingLiterature state—not yet scientific evidence
LIBRARY02 · Scientific Paper IntelligenceAvailable
Structure full text without losing provenance.
Scientific extraction processes supported reusable PMC content or an authorized private PDF into reviewable study information, populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, methods, and source-linked Evidence Statements.
- Rights-aware full-text acquisition
- Authorized private PDF upload
- Structured Scientific Extraction
- Evidence Statements with exact anchors
- Pending, accepted, corrected, and rejected review states
- No guarantee of perfect extraction
// Scientific paper intelligenceAvailable
Illustrative biomedical publicationPrivate full text · structured extraction
Structured context
Study informationPopulationInterventionOutcome
Evidence StatementSource-linked scientific claim retained with qualification and review state.Results · exact document anchorInspect provenance
03 · Scientific Search & Ask My EvidenceAvailable
Search records or ask grounded questions.
Scientific Search retrieves structured project evidence. Ask My Evidence uses retrieved project evidence to compose a cited answer and can report that the available evidence is insufficient.
- Project-scoped scientific retrieval
- Ranked evidence records with provenance
- Cited grounded answers
- Visible limitations and conflicting findings
- Explicit insufficient-evidence outcome
- Not unrestricted biomedical Q&A
// Project evidence retrievalAvailable
Scientific SearchRanked project evidence with publication and source provenanceEvidence Statement · source anchor · review state
Ask My EvidenceGrounded answer claim linked to cited project evidence.Insufficient evidence remains an explicit possible result.
From evidence to research intelligence
Develop hypotheses while keeping evidence relationships explicit.
Research Questions define scientific scope. Hypothesis Assistance constructs grounded candidates with explicit assumptions, predictions, knowledge gaps, and uncertainty for researcher review.
EvidenceResearch QuestionHypothesis AssistanceEvidence RelationshipsEvidence Map
Grounded Hypothesis Assistance
Researchers select or retrieve project evidence, inspect candidate hypotheses, and accept, correct, or reject them. Assistance does not validate a hypothesis.
Explicit Evidence Relationships
Supports, contradicts, neutral, and uncertain describe how evidence relates to an exact Hypothesis Revision. They are not a probability that the hypothesis is true.
Evidence Map
See the evidence landscape around your hypothesis.
Evidence Maps organize immutable source contributions around one exact Hypothesis Revision. Supporting, contradicting, neutral, uncertain, and source-summary mixed states remain visible alongside review maturity, exclusions, and provenance—without converting counts into a score.
// Evidence Map · illustrative interfaceAvailable
3 Evidence SourcesReview state visibleNo scientific score
Source A · Publication proxyHuman observational · FVC
SupportsSource B · Study-linked sourcePrimary fibroblasts · collagen expression
ContradictsSource C · Publication proxyAnimal model · multiple outcomes
MixedExpand source → Evidence Statements → provenance
// Context Matrix · illustrative interfaceAvailable
| Source | Population / System | Intervention / Exposure | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Source A | Human cohort | Observational exposure | FVC |
| Source B | Primary fibroblasts | Receptor inhibition | Collagen expression |
Different contexts can inform the same hypothesis without being treated as equivalent experiments.
Biomedical Context Matrix
See where evidence differs.
Compare Population / Biological System, Intervention / Exposure, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design, and Time / Duration. Apparently conflicting findings may occur in different contexts; the matrix helps researchers inspect those differences without claiming to explain the cause automatically.
Research guidance
You always know what comes next.
Contextual Research Guide guidance explains what a page does, its prerequisites, typical next steps, genuine blockers, and its place in the workflow. Recommendations are deterministic workflow assistance—not scientific judgment.
Provenance first
Every important claim should have a trail.
Lineage remains attached from document and structured extraction through Evidence Statements and downstream evidence use. Generated representations remain inspectable and researcher-reviewed.
Designed for research traceability
Private project scope, explicit provenance, researcher control.
The product uses implemented authorization and private-storage boundaries without claiming a certification or absolute security guarantee.
Evidence grounded
Research intelligence remains connected to project evidence and source lineage.
Provenance first
Scientific claims retain document, extraction, and source-anchor traceability.
Researcher reviewed
Generated structures and candidates can be inspected, corrected, accepted, or rejected.
Private workspace
Projects, uploaded documents, questions, and hypotheses remain access-controlled and project-scoped.
Planned · not currently available
Lab Calculator Suite
A future calculation workspace for common laboratory calculations. It is not part of the current live research workflow.
Early access
Join the founding researcher group.
Explore the implemented research workflow and help shape how evidence-grounded biomedical research tools develop. Pricing, paid plans, founding rates, billing intervals, and usage allowances have not been announced.
No checkout, payment, subscription, Team / Lab enrollment, or permanent-rate promise is offered on this page.
FAQ
What to know before starting.
What is bioresearch2go?
An evidence-grounded biomedical research workspace connecting literature discovery, structured extraction, traceable Evidence Statements, scientific retrieval, hypothesis work, and evidence mapping.
Does it replace PubMed?
No. PubMed Discovery searches external literature. bioresearch2go adds project selection, repeatable searches, optional Monitoring, full-text processing, and downstream evidence workflows.
Can it access every full-text paper?
No. It does not unlock publisher paywalls. Supported acquisition includes reusable PMC content where rights permit and PDFs a researcher is authorized to upload.
How is an Evidence Statement different from an AI summary?
An Evidence Statement is an inspectable scientific claim linked to document context and provenance. It retains review state and can be accepted, corrected, or rejected.
What is Scientific Search?
Scientific Search retrieves structured evidence inside the current project. It is distinct from PubMed Discovery and does not compose an answer.
What is Ask My Evidence?
It retrieves project evidence and composes a grounded answer with citations and limitations. Insufficient evidence is a valid outcome; it is not unrestricted biomedical Q&A.
How does Hypothesis Assistance work?
Researchers select or retrieve project evidence, inspect grounded candidate hypotheses with explicit assumptions, predictions, knowledge gaps, and uncertainty, then accept, correct, or reject them. It does not prove or validate a hypothesis.
What is an Evidence Map?
An immutable source-level landscape around an exact Hypothesis Revision. It keeps supports, contradicts, neutral, uncertain, and source-summary mixed contributions visible without calculating a truth probability.
What does the Context Matrix show?
For context-aware snapshots it compares Population / Biological System, Intervention / Exposure, Comparator, Outcome, Study Design, and Time / Duration. It helps inspect differences without deciding which source is correct.
Is my research private?
Projects and uploaded documents are access-controlled and project-scoped. Private-data provider policy is designed to fail closed; this is an implementation description, not a compliance certification or absolute security guarantee.
Does the product use AI models with private data?
Some scientific workflows can use configured model providers. Private data is sent only when the configured provider policy permits it; otherwise the workflow refuses. Deterministic areas such as guidance and Evidence Map grouping do not require model inference.
Start with an evidence-grounded workspace
Build research intelligence without losing the scientific trail.
Create an account to begin a project, or return to your workspace to continue existing research.